Discussion:
Ops Console to Physical Console
(too old to reply)
crystal1
2006-01-06 00:40:24 UTC
Permalink
I'm considering switching our 400's console from Operations Console via
the IBM-supplied serial cable, to a physical console. We have the
physical console available in the office along with the twinax cable, etc.

What will I need to do to make the change over? What should be checked
ahead of time?

TIA
Glenn Robinson
2006-01-07 17:55:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by crystal1
I'm considering switching our 400's console from Operations Console via
the IBM-supplied serial cable, to a physical console. We have the
physical console available in the office along with the twinax cable, etc.
What will I need to do to make the change over? What should be checked
ahead of time?
TIA
Go to the Information Centre and look at the Consoles section. There's a
downloadable PDF all about Consoles and it discusses how you migrate
to/from Twinax etc.

Ops Console is pretty rubbish but I've found LAN console to be very
useful and far more reliable than Ops Console.

A number of my customers are using LAN console but also have a twinax
card too which can be used as a backup if ever the LAN console should
fail. It's all in the PFF manual.

Glenn
Chris M. Roberts
2006-01-09 20:39:39 UTC
Permalink
The setting for using a green-screen terminal instead of the ops
console is in the dedicated service tools. Perform a manual IPL, enter
DST, and you can set it there.

Chris
iSeriesDude
2006-01-10 01:22:30 UTC
Permalink
Why? You're going the opposite direction of everyone else.

Thanks,
iSeriesDude
Post by crystal1
I'm considering switching our 400's console from Operations Console via
the IBM-supplied serial cable, to a physical console. We have the
physical console available in the office along with the twinax cable, etc.
What will I need to do to make the change over? What should be checked
ahead of time?
TIA
Chris M. Roberts
2006-01-10 07:10:24 UTC
Permalink
"Why? You're going the opposite direction of everyone else."

Because unlike the operations navigator, the operations console, and
the remote console, the green screen twin-ax console never, ever goes
down. Forever and Amen. ;)

Chris
iSeriesDude
2006-01-11 01:44:10 UTC
Permalink
While I agree the Twinax console/dumb terminal as stable as it gets, you
still have an exposure by only having a single device for your console.

If its stability you want, then throw away that Twinax card and replace it
with a LAN card and implement LAN console. You have just as much chance
of losing a LAN card as you do a Twinax card. And now your maintain the
ability to remotely administer your server from anywhere you can connect
to your network. Be it your desk, or in the comfort of your home.

If that is not enough, then take it a step further and keep your PC that
is direct attached and have it be an alternate console. Configure the PC
with both the LAN console connection (Primary console) and a direct
attached connection (Alternate console). That way you can use the PC as
your primary method of accessing the server. Use remote desktop sharing
or PC Anywhere or what ever your fancy to remotely connect to that PC from
anywhere in your network. In the event the console goes down, no worries
just connect from your work laptop or PC via the LAN console.

With this setup you have two paths (redundancy) into your server. Both of
which afford you the ability to control the server as if you were standing
directly in front of it.

Thanks,
iSeriesDude.
Post by Chris M. Roberts
"Why? You're going the opposite direction of everyone else."
Because unlike the operations navigator, the operations console, and the
remote console, the green screen twin-ax console never, ever goes down.
Forever and Amen. ;)
Chris
Loading...