Khouw Thiam Hok
2003-09-26 23:53:48 UTC
Hi guys,
I don't know whether this matter has been discussed in this forum.
Try this way:
Do not logoff from your workstation today (lets say Sept 26,2003) , let the
system gets to the next system date -sysval QDATE (Sept 27,2003).
After sysval QDATE changed then get back to your unlogoff workstation
a. in CLP/CLLE , you may find that your command RTVJOBA to retrieve date ,
will give the return value Sept 26, 2003 instead of Sept 27, 2003 (return
value with the date of your login's date)
b. in DSPF, you may find that your keyword date will give you Sept 26, 2003
instead of Sept 27, 2003 (displayed with the date of your login's date)
c, in RPG/RPGLE, you may find that operation code *date or udate will give
you the date of your login's date.
For comparison, try 'sysreq' to the other session or other workstation with
new fresh login and do the point a, b and c. Then you will get the real
value of return date.
Hmmmm , is it considered as bugs or IBM's new features?
HOK
I don't know whether this matter has been discussed in this forum.
Try this way:
Do not logoff from your workstation today (lets say Sept 26,2003) , let the
system gets to the next system date -sysval QDATE (Sept 27,2003).
After sysval QDATE changed then get back to your unlogoff workstation
a. in CLP/CLLE , you may find that your command RTVJOBA to retrieve date ,
will give the return value Sept 26, 2003 instead of Sept 27, 2003 (return
value with the date of your login's date)
b. in DSPF, you may find that your keyword date will give you Sept 26, 2003
instead of Sept 27, 2003 (displayed with the date of your login's date)
c, in RPG/RPGLE, you may find that operation code *date or udate will give
you the date of your login's date.
For comparison, try 'sysreq' to the other session or other workstation with
new fresh login and do the point a, b and c. Then you will get the real
value of return date.
Hmmmm , is it considered as bugs or IBM's new features?
HOK